现代性是政治—行政二分范式产生的宏大叙事背景。假定政治—行政二分范式与现代性相契合且未发生变化,该范式引发了公共行政民主与效率的价值争论并主导了逻辑实证主义与规范性的研究路径。由此发生了政治—行政二分范式的隐忧,即公共行政理论外向拓展受到极大的限制,公共行政的研究方法拘泥于规范性与逻辑实证主义并侧重于后者,导致实践中的公共行政日益陷入现代性困境而不自知。公共行政需要担当寻求人类社会终极价值的责任,进而在理论与方法上实现新的突破。 Modernity is the grand narrative background of political-administrative dichotomy. Assuming that the political-administrative dichotomy coincides with and does not change with modernity, the paradigm has triggered a debate over the value of democracy and efficiency in public administration and has led to the study of logical positivism and normative approaches. As a result, political-administrative bisectionality worries occur, that is to say, the outward development of public administration theory is greatly restricted. The research methods of public administration are rigidly based on normative and logical positivism and focus on the latter, which leads to the increasing public administration in practice Into the plight of modernity do not know. Public administration needs to assume the responsibility of seeking the ultimate value of human society and thus achieve new breakthroughs in theory and methodology.