论文部分内容阅读
侯大叔向李大伯借了6000块钱迟迟不还,李大伯将侯大叔告到法院。侯大叔辩称自己因轻信马路广告被骗3万多元,6000元是双方的共同投资,现在投资失败应当各半承担损失。近日,在上海市长宁区人民法院毛金林法官的耐心调解下,侯大叔与李大伯达成了延期还款协议。毛法官提醒老年朋友,增强防范意识,谨防上当受骗。一张借条前不久,李大伯向长宁区人民法院起诉,要求侯大叔归还借款6000元。由于借款金额小,法律关系简单,法院决定适用简易程序,由审判员毛金林独任审理此案,毛法官很快
Hou uncle to Li Dabo borrowed 6,000 late, Lee Uncle Hou uncle sued the court. Hou uncle defended himself deceived by more than 30,000 yuan due to the guilty cons on the road advertising, 6,000 yuan is a joint investment between the two sides, and now the investment failure should be half to bear the loss. Recently, under the patient mediation of Mao Jinlin, judge of Changning District People’s Court in Shanghai, Hou Da Shu and Li Dabo reached an agreement on deferred repayments. Judge Mao reminded elderly friends to enhance their awareness of prevention and guard against being deceived. Shortly before an IOU, Li Dabo filed a lawsuit in Changning District People’s Court demanding that Hou Dahui return the loan of 6,000 yuan. Due to the small amount of loans, the legal relationship is simple, the court decided to apply summary procedure, the trial by the judge Mao Jinlin sole case, Judge Mao soon