论文部分内容阅读
合同的存在能够帮助司法部门在遇到问题时可以有解决的依据,能够帮助民众得到更为合情合理的解决方案,使民众的利益得到保证,司法部门也能够秉持公正,更好的为人民服务。而合同中的买卖合同和承揽合同之间有诸多相似之处,两者都具有有偿、双务、诺成和非要式合同的特征,两者的定义在一定程度上也有其相似之处,这就使得两样合同在具体的实践和操作中容易混淆,进而造成司法部门在判断上的混淆和失误。因此,对买卖合同和承揽合同进行比较,使得两者的内容得以分清,不论对司法部门,还是对民众,都有很大的意义。
The existence of the contract can help the judiciary to find a solution to the problem when it encounters problems, help the people to get a more reasonable solution, ensure the interests of the people and ensure that the judiciary can serve the people justly and better. There are many similarities between contracts of sale and purchase and contracts of contract, both of which have the characteristics of compensation, dual service, promise and non-essential contracts. The definitions of the two have similarities to some extent, This makes the two kinds of contracts easy to be confused in the concrete practice and operation, thus causing the judgment and confusion of the judiciary. Therefore, comparing the contract of sale with the contract of contract makes the contents of both be distinguished, and it is of great significance to both the judicial department and the public.