论文部分内容阅读
关于改革路径的选择,转型经济学与改革实践提出了两种大相径庭的思路。一种为“激进式思路”,核心是大力推进私有化和市场价格自由化,即资产或服务功能从公有制向私人拥有或控制转移,目的在于提高有关资产或服务功能的经济绩效,促进经济决策的非政治化,削弱公共部门的力量,实行较广泛的资产私有制(萨克斯与李普顿,1990;萨克斯,1992)。在俄罗斯与东欧实践中,这种思路曾经取得过遏制通货膨胀与外汇黑市、增加供给等效果,但近年来也
On the choice of the path of reform, transition economics and reform practice put forward two very different ideas. One is “radical thinking,” with the core of vigorously promoting privatization and market price liberalization, that is, the transfer of assets or service functions from public ownership to private ownership or control with the aim of improving the economic performance of assets or service functions and promoting economic decision-making De-politicization, weakening the power of the public sector, and implementing a wider range of asset-private ownership (Sachs & Lipton, 1990; Sachs, 1992). In the practice of Russia and Eastern Europe, this kind of thinking has been made to curb inflation and foreign exchange black market, to increase supply and other effects, but also in recent years