论文部分内容阅读
6岁女童小甜因为就读学校不是离家最近的,将上海市浦东新区教育局起诉到法院。近日,上海市浦东新区人民法院一审驳回原告的诉讼请求。小甜在起诉状中称,在浦东新区教育局2014年4月1日公布的小学招生地段公示上,自己的户籍地址,同时也是房产所在地和实际居住地,居然没有对口的小学。这种做法,严重违反了义务教育法和上海市未成年人保护条例的相关规定,侵犯了原告合法的受教育权。小甜在诉讼中提出,离自家住宅小区由近
6-year-old girl Sweet because the school is not the nearest home away from Shanghai Pudong New District Education Bureau to the court. Recently, the Pudong New District People’s Court of Shanghai dismissed the plaintiff’s claim in its first instance. Small sweet in the complaint said that in Pudong New Area Board of Education announced on April 1, 2014 publicity on the area of primary enrollment, their household address, but also the location of the real estate and the actual place of residence, but there is no counterpart of the primary school. This practice seriously violated the relevant provisions of the compulsory education law and the regulations on the protection of minors in Shanghai and violated the plaintiff’s lawful right to education. Sweet made in the proceedings, from the residential area near by