柳宗元《小石潭记》文末有“隶而从者”句,人教版语文课本注释为“跟着同去的”。2014年第3期《咬文嚼字》载《<小石潭记>注解之浅见》一文,文中写道:…隶’既然是‘跟着’之义,那么后边何必再用一个意义相同的‘从’字,并用‘而’来连接两者呢?“”此处的‘隶’注释为‘仆从,用作动词’,似乎更为妥当。“其理由是:”《始得西山宴游记》说得很清楚:‘遂命仆人过湘江,缘染溪,斫榛莽,焚茅茷。’他们不是 Liu Zongyuan “Little Stone Note” at the end of the text “” and “slave from” sentence, PEP textbook notes “Follow the same ”. 2014, No. 3, “Bite the text” contains “a note of Note”, in the article wrote: ... Since Li is the meaning of ’follow’, then why use the same meaning after a ’from’ And use ’and’ to connect the two? “” Here the ’Li’ annotated as ’servant, used as a verb’ seems to be more appropriate. “The reason is: ” “was the Xishan Feast Travel” made it very clear: ’Then ordered the servant crossed the Xiang River, edge stained Creek, Zhen haze Mang, burning Maotai. ’they are not