论文部分内容阅读
图书版权页信息反映了作品出版、印刷的重要事实,也是著作权人行使权利、追究侵权的重要依据。目前,图书出版业普遍存在中间商,虽不受国家图书出版、印刷行政机关管理,但与出版社共同参与图书出版、印刷,加上出版社自身管理不严,出版图书的版权页标注混乱。著作权人为同样内容的侵权图书多次诉讼维权,一方面给著作权人保护权利带来困难,另一方面也因“一书多案”是适用一事不再理原则还是第一次判决的执行问题而引发法律争议。对本案,法院经审理认为先后两案的“一书”是不同的版本,最终判定图书出版者应对所出版图书中的侵权内容承担责任。
The information of the book copyright page reflects the important fact that the work is published and printed. It is also an important basis for the copyright owner to exercise the rights and hold the infringement. At present, there are widespread middlemen in the book publishing industry. Although they are not managed by the national book publishing and printing administrative departments, they are involved in the publishing and printing of books together with the publishing houses. Moreover, the management of the publishing houses itself is not strict and the copyright pages of the publishing books are confused. On the one hand, it is difficult for the copyright owner to protect the rights of the copyright owner, on the other hand, because “one case with multiple rights” is applicable to the principle of non-principle or the execution of the first judgment Problems lead to legal disputes. In the present case, the court considered the case of “one book ” is a different version, and ultimately determine that the book publisher should be responsible for the contents of the infringement in the published book.