论文部分内容阅读
李善《文选注》所引《缠子》,汉唐诸志均未著录。结合典籍与史志目录等相关记载,并检核李善《文选注》、马总《意林》、《太平御览》等所存之佚文,可知缠子为战国时墨家学者,与儒者董无心同时,他继承墨子的学说如右鬼、反对妄杀等,并努力宣扬,与董无心辩难。《缠子》虽仅存数则,但对我们今天认识墨子之后墨家学派的发展以及儒墨之争的情况有一定的价值。文章对《董子》亦略加考辨。
Li Shan “Wenxuanzhu” cited “Tangzi”, Han and Tang Zhu Zhi are not recorded. Combining the records of the books and the records of the history of the Chronicles, and examining the lost essays kept by Li Shan, such as Wenxuanzhu, Ma Zonglin and Taipingyuyan, it can be seen that when the entanglement is the Mohism Scholar in the Warring States Period, At the same time, he inherited the doctrine of Mozi as the right ghost and opposed the assassination, etc., and tried hard to preach and tediously discredited Dong. Although there are only a few numbers of “tangzi”, it is of some value for us to understand the development of the Mohist School and the rival Confucianism and Mohism after we recognize Mozi today. The article on “Dong” is also slightly test.