宪法学方法论需要学科的自觉与超脱,自觉作为一种对本身认识看法的拔升和转变,其本身并不必然带有方向性的特征,然而超脱则不然,其带有明显的方向性,以革命的方式与其关联做一番切割。宪法学作为一种科学,其自立亦由此方法和知识来型架。宪法学之不能自立,原由在于方法论受制于政治学,但是否可置宪法学知识个性构成及学科关联于不顾,是值得商榷的。宪法学方法论是混淆于政治学方法论中无从辨认,还是泯然于一般法学方法论中无法觅形,应有一个清醒的认识。 Constitutional methodology needs discipline awareness and detachment, consciously as a kind of perception of their perception of the ups and transformation itself does not necessarily have directional characteristics, but the detached is not the case, with its obvious direction to Revolutionary ways to do some cutting with it. Constitutional law as a science, its self-reliance on this method and knowledge to frame. The reason why constitutional law can not stand on its own is that the methodology is subject to political science. However, it is debatable whether constitutional knowledge of constitutional science is constituted or disregarded. Constitutional methodology is confused in political methodology can not identify, or suddenly in general legal methodology can not find shape, there should be a clear understanding.