小学五年级的暑假,妈妈让我参加了少年宫的口才演讲兴趣班。闷热的教室里只有风扇乎乎地转,同学们依次上讲台机械地讲述前一晚准备的演讲稿。老师倚着墙壁拿扇子扇着风,时不时点评两句:声音不够响亮,举例不够生动,话题分析不够透彻。我讨厌极了那个兴趣班。长久以来,大多数人对口才好的定义似乎只有一种:无论在什么场合都能侃侃而谈,无论谈什么话题都能风趣犀利。近年来有一档非常火的辩论综艺节目《奇葩说》,节目中的辩手使尽十八般武艺撒泼卖萌讲段子绕逻辑,赢来观众一片叫好的同 Fifth grade summer vacation, my mother let me attend the Children’s Palace eloquence interest classes. The hot classroom only fans turn around, the students followed by the podium mechanically about the preparation of the speech the night before. The teacher leaned against the wall and took the fan fan of the wind, commenting from time to time two sentences: the sound is not loud enough, the examples are not vivid enough and the topic analysis is not thorough enough. I hate the most interest class. For a long time, most people seem to have only one definition of good eloquence: They can talk freely no matter what the occasion, and they can be funny regardless of the topic they talk about. In recent years there is a very fire debate variety show “wonderful work”, the program’s debaters make every effort to make the best of eighteen martial arts Salsa sprouting around logic, won the audience a good applause