论文部分内容阅读
应用ＥＬＩＳＡ法和ＩＲＭＡ法测定９５对滤纸静脉血斑ｓＴＳＨ。结果表明，应用ＩＲＭＡ法和ＥＬＩＳＡ法测定同一个体静脉血斑ｓＴＳＨ其结果无差异性，两者存在正相关（ｒ＝０．４９６），回归方程Ｙ血斑ＥＬＩＳＡ法＝０．４５＋０．７６Ｘ血斑ＩＲＭＡ法。即静脉血斑ｓＴＳＨＩＲＭＡ法的５ｍＵ／Ｌ、１０ｍＵ／Ｌ相当于ＥＬＩＳＡ法的４．２５ｍＵ／Ｌ和８．０５ｍＵ／Ｌ；其次，ＩＲＭＡ法和ＥＬＩＳＡ法对静脉血斑ｓＴＳＨ的测定结果与ＩＲＭＡ法对血清ｓＴＳＨ的测定值均有良好的线性回归关系。因此，静脉血斑ｓＴＳＨ的测定结果在一定程度上可替代静脉血清反映机体甲状腺功能的变化
Ninety-five pairs of filter stenosed venous blood spots were detected by ELISA and IRMA. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups (r = 0.496) using the IRMA method and the ELISA method for the determination of sTSH in the same individual. The regression equation Y blood spot ELISA method was 0.45 + 0.76X IRMA method. 5mU / L, 10mU / L of sTSHIRMA method was equivalent to 4.25mU / L and 8.05mU / L of ELISA method. Secondly, IRMA method and ELISA method were used to determine the sTSH of venous blood spot and IRMA method Serum sTSH measured values have a good linear regression. Therefore, the results of the determination of venous blood sTSH to some extent to replace the venous serum reflect changes in the body’s thyroid function