近十年来,党史学界对红军西路军的历史进行了重新探讨。取得了“突破性进展”——在彻底否定“传统观点”的基础上得出了全新的结论。这的确是值得令人称道的好事。它不仅使辛存于世、漂落八方的原西路军战士得到了公正的待遇,而且,在党史学研究领域也带了一个活跃学术气氛的好头。但是,统观西路军史研究的结果,我们在拍手称贺之余,心中尚留一丝小小的谴憾——学术界在对西路军史研究中,特别是对西路军失败原因之“传统观点”的否定 In the past ten years, the history of the party of the Party History has revisited the history of the Red Army West Route Army. “Breakthroughs” have been made - a completely new conclusion has been reached on the basis of a complete rejection of the “traditional viewpoints”. This is indeed commendable good thing. It has not only made the survival of the world a good place for the former West Route Army soldiers who have been floating around in all directions, but also brought along a good academic atmosphere in the field of study of the history of the Party. However, judging from the results of the research on the history of the West Army, we clapped his hands and left a hint of regret. In the study of West Army history, especially in the study of the causes of the failure of the West Route Army Negation of “traditional viewpoints”