武当道教文化影响下的一个文化案例:基于武当武术的历史梳理

来源 :中华武术(研究) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:gnayief
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
武当武术是中华传统武术中的一个重要拳派。然而,在对于武当武术的历史形成问题上,自民国以来一直存在着两种截然不同的观点:第一种观点以唐豪先生为代表,他通过历史文献考证,认为后人所谓张三峰创立武当拳之云云,只是“层累地编造”与渲染而已;另一种观点则有陈微明、吴图南等,他们沿承某些史籍记载及传闻之说,言之凿凿地肯定张三峰所创拳派的“一脉相传”。改革开放以来,随着武术理论的发展,有关武当武术的历史形成再次引起研究者的关注,但遗憾的是,似乎并未在前人的基础上有所进展。毫无疑问,上述两种观点并其所依据的视域及方法,均存在或多或少的问题。本文采用历史学与文化学相结合的方法,对武当武术的历史脉络及形成原因作了简要梳理与分析,希冀裨益于武当武术研究的纵深发展。 Wudang martial arts is an important martial art in China. However, there are two completely different views on the historical formation of Wudang martial arts since the Republic of China. The first one is represented by Tang Hao. Through the textual research of historical documents, he believes that later generations called Zhang Sanfeng the founder of Wudang There is nothing more than “strenuous fabrication” and rendering; another point of view is Chen Weiming and Wu Tu-nan. Some of them inherit certain historical records and rumors that they certainly affirm that Zhang Sanfeng Create a boxing Since the reform and opening up, with the development of martial arts theory, the historical formation of Wudang martial arts once again aroused the concern of researchers, but unfortunately, it seems that there is no progress on the basis of the predecessors. There is no doubt that there are more or less problems with the above two kinds of views and the fields and methods by which they are based. Based on the combination of history and culture, this paper briefly sorts out and analyzes the historical context of Wudang martial arts and its causes, hoping to benefit the further development of Wudang martial arts research.
其他文献
摘 要:当代教学方式的多样化,教学手段的不断发展给现代课堂教学提供了更多的教学方式。在新课标的要求下,基础教育得到重视。如何高效地完成课堂教学任务,并切实培养学生的创新能力成为当下的重要课题。在教师的引导下,让学生更加积极、主动、高效地自主学习,更好地培养学生的创新思维以及能力。从传统教学方式的分析以及自主探究模式的四种不同应用入手,结合自身教学经验,提出了自主研究课堂模式的实践与探索。  关键词