在目前反右傾、鼓干勁运动的高潮中,李蔚普先生打算把全都内經作出淺显的解釋,以为学习内經的阶梯,这种干勁是大的。遺憾的是从他仅仅的开首几段文字来看,已存在不少的严重的思想问题,如若任他发展下去,对于李先生个人和广大读者危害性都很大,本刊及时展开批判,这是完全必要的。不过我看他首先提出:“在語譯的文章結构、文章风格及語法方面,則应灌注我們这一时代的特点”,这种旧瓶注新酒的研究方法,是否正确?属另一問题,暂不置論。对于他們用什么方法来灌注?和灌注些什么?則是一个关鍵性問题,我們应予注意。茲将个人意見提出如下: ①原文云:“本节可以有两种看法:一种是尽量使黄帝神化;另一种是使黄帝尽量符合历史实际和生活实际,我們应当采取后一种看法而反对前者”。我們 At the climax of the current anti-rightist and pro-motivated movement, Mr LI Wei-pu intends to make a plain explanation for all the Canon of Internal Medicine. He believes that learning from the ladder of the Nei Jing is great. Regrettably, from his first few passages, there have been many serious ideological problems. If any one is left to carry on his development, it will be very harmful to both Mr. Li and his readers. In this critical issue, This is absolutely necessary. However, I think he first proposed that “in the translation of the article structure, style and grammar of the article, we should perpetuate the characteristics of our time”, this old bottle of new wine research methods, is correct? Is another issue, Temporarily not to talk about. It is a key issue that we should pay attention to for what methods they use for perfusion and perfusion. I hereby put forward my personal opinion as follows: ① The original text says: “This section can have two kinds of views: one is to try to deify the Yellow Emperor; the other is to make the Yellow Emperor conform to historical reality and real life as much as possible. We should adopt the latter view Oppose the former. ” we