一我同意这样的看法:近几十年来,我国文艺理论相当活跃,相当多元,亦相当混乱,它一直处在各种“转型”中,至今也没有停歇。但是,这种“转型”存在两条不同的路径,一条是逐步向中国化马克思主义文艺理论的当代形态靠拢,一条是走上日益疏离马克思主义文论的“西化”式“转型”之路。这两条路径分野明显,分歧也很清楚。不过,令人奇怪的是,前一种路径很少有人去梳理、去研究、去首肯。相反,后一种路径却被一些人当成了新时期文艺理论“转型”的主体,当成 I agree with this view: In recent decades, the theory of literature and art in our country has been quite active, quite diverse and quite chaotic. It has been in various “transitions” and has not stopped. However, there are two different approaches to this “transformation”. One is to gradually move closer to the contemporary form of the Marxist literary theory in China, and the other is to embark on the “Westernization” style that increasingly alienates the Marxist literary theory. Transformation “road. The two paths are distinct and the differences are clear. However, what is strange is that very few people in the previous category have gone to study, to approve. On the contrary, the latter path has been regarded by some as the main body of the ”transition" theory of literature and art in the new era. When