论文部分内容阅读
根据竞争中立政策引入的事实判断标准,对照中国(上海)自由贸易试验区的改革文件,应当可以确定中国(上海)自由贸易试验区已经引入竞争中立政策。根据中国(上海)自由贸易试验区的实践来看,我们没有盲目地照抄照搬澳大利亚或者OECD的竞争中立政策;但是中国(上海)自由贸易试验区的竞争中立政策在实体性内容上与应然做法还存在一定距离。根据实践来看,中国(上海)自由贸易试验区的行政执法在现有面上很好地贯彻了竞争中立政策,这集中表现在中国(上海)自由贸易试验区的执法公平上;中国(上海)自由贸易试验区在体制改革上积极推行了负面清单管理模式,在最大限度上取消了很多领域的市场进入限制;但是,中国(上海)自由贸易试验区在竞争倡导上目前还没有针对竞争中立政策进行有效关注。
According to the factual criteria introduced by the competition-neutral policy, comparing with the reform documents of the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, it should be possible to confirm that the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone has introduced a policy of competition neutrality. According to the practice of the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, we did not blindly copy or copy the competition neutral policy of Australia or the OECD. However, the policy of competition neutrality in the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone There is still some distance. According to practice, the administrative law enforcement of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone has implemented the competition-neutral policy on the existing face. This is mainly reflected in the law enforcement fairness of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone. China (Shanghai ) Pilot Free Trade Zone has actively implemented the negative list management mode in the system reform and has eliminated the market access restrictions in many fields to the maximum extent. However, there is no competition neutrality target in China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone for competitive neutrality Effective policy attention.