首都师范大学历史学院的林漫和邓家力于2015年7月22日对北京大学长江学者王晴佳教授进行了学术访谈。访谈主要围绕着“近二十年西方史学理论研究与历史书写”的项目内容展开,包括当前西方史学的发展趋势、世纪之交西方史学理论的变化及其对历史书写的影响、西方马克思主义史学、跨文化历史研究等方面的问题。王教授在访谈中提出,当前史学有两大平行发展的潮流,但其共同之处在于突破近代西方为我们建立的知识架构;后现代主义并非被超越了,而是很多观念已经被内化于历史研究中;马克思主义的生命力在于对现代社会和现代性的批判,这与后现代主义有一定关联,对后现代主义的认识需要从其产生的社会条件出发,这是一种唯物史观的方法;跨文化研究对当前的历史写作是一个较好的切入点,可以提出很多新的选题;全球史研究不能停留在理论层面的讨论,而需以具体的历史写作展开大量的实践性研究;在中外史学交流中仍然存在着“不对称”的问题。现将访谈内容刊发以飨读者。 Lin Man and Deng Jiali from the History College of Capital Normal University conducted an academic interview on July 22, 2015 with Professor Wang Qingjia, a scholar at the Yangtze River in Peking University. The interviews mainly focus on the contents of the project “Research and Historical Writing of Western Historiography in the Past Two Decades”, including the current development trend of western historiography, the change of western historiography at the turn of the century and its influence on historical writing, Doctrine of history, intercultural history and other issues. In his interview, Professor Wang pointed out that there are two parallel trends in current history. However, what they have in common is that they break through the knowledge structure established by us in the modern West. Postmodernism has not been surpassed. Many ideas have been internalized in Historical research; the vitality of Marxism lies in the criticism of modern society and modernity, which has some connection with post-modernism. The recognition of post-modernism needs to proceed from the social conditions it produces. This is a historical materialism Methods; cross-cultural studies on the current history of writing is a good starting point, you can put forward many new topics; the study of global history can not stop at the theoretical level of discussion, and the need for a specific historical writing a lot of practical research There is still the problem of “asymmetry ” in the exchange of Chinese and foreign historiography. The interview will now be published for readers.