论文部分内容阅读
不少研究者认为,王家新提出的“个人写作”诗学,是先锋诗歌理论内部的一次战略性调整,是“朦胧诗”、“第三代”诗歌之后的又一次先锋主义诗歌运动。其实这个理论在叙述上设下了一个圈套,用现代主义、后现代主义的理论术语包裹了一些最传统的,如社会学批评的一些观念主张。这个看似与艾略特的现代主义诗论以及福柯的新历史主义、解构主义哲学遥相呼应的诗学理论,骨子里对这些东西是极为抵触的,黑格尔、马克思的哲学、美学思想才是“个人写作”的立足之本。所谓的“个人写作”就是一种与“个人”无关,而要对政治、意识形态有所依附和承担的写作。
Many researchers think that Wang Ji-Xin’s “personal writing ” poetics is a strategic adjustment within Pioneer Poetics and is another one after “Dirty Poem” and “Third Generation” poetry Avant-garde poetry movement. In fact, this theory has set a trap in the narrative, using the modernist and postmodern theoretical terms to wrap up some of the most traditional ideas such as sociological criticism. This seemingly poetic theory echoes with Eliot’s modernist theory of poetry and Foucault’s neo-historicism and deconstructionist philosophy is extremely contradictory to these things, and Hegel’s and Marx’s philosophical and aesthetic thoughts are “Personal writing ” based on this. The so-called “personal writing ” is a “personal ” has nothing to do, but to political, ideological dependence and commitment to writing.