很少有一种提法,像“高效课堂”一样,得到人们的“一致拥护”。不论教学主张正确与否,也不论思想境界高下如何,都可以在高效课堂的旗帜下和平共处、同床异梦。因为,什么是高效?不同的人有不同的解读。素质教育的开创者,以发展和完善人为使命,以课程改革为动力,以提高质量为目标,试图让课堂焕发生命的活力,让学生得到充分的发展。我们当然会说这样的课堂是高效的。但用高效来评价这样的课 There is very little a way to get “unanimous support” from people like “Efficient Classroom.” Regardless of whether the teaching ideas are correct or not, no matter how high the ideological level is, they can all co-exist peacefully and dreamlikely under the banner of efficient classrooms. Because, what is efficient? Different people have different interpretations. Quality education pioneers, to develop and improve the human mission, curriculum reform as a driving force to improve the quality of the goal, trying to make the classroom full of life vitality, so that students can fully develop. Of course we would say that such a classroom is efficient. But to evaluate such courses with high efficiency