论文部分内容阅读
历史比较方法有着悠久的历史。在西方的“历史之父”希罗多德(约公元前484-前425年)的名著《历史》、中国史学的开山祖司马迁(约公元前145-前90年)的《史记》中,就已经使用历史比较方法研究并叙述古代史。比较史学在当代被赋予新的内容,更多地受到历史学家的重视,主要应归功于法国年鉴学派的创始人之一——马克·布洛克(1886-1944年)。他在理论和实践的结合上,推动了比较史学的发展,因而被称为“比较历史之父”。历史比较方法作为历史科学研究的一般方法,在军事历史研究中无疑有着广阔的前景。1985年在斯图亚特召开的第16届国际历史科学大
The historical comparison method has a long history. In the historical records of Herodotus (circa 484 BC-425 BC BC) in the West and in the historical records of Ma Chien (about 145-90 BC), the founder of Chinese history, We have used historical comparison to study and narrate ancient history. Comparative historiography has been given new content in the modern era, more and more attention by historians, mainly due to one of the founders of the French Almanac - Mark Bullock (1886-1944). He combined the theory and practice to promote the development of comparative history, which is called “the father of comparative history.” As a general method of historical scientific research, the historical comparative method undoubtedly has a broad prospect in the study of military history. The 16th International Congress of History and Science held in Stuart in 1985