论文部分内容阅读
20世纪70年代末开始的新自由主义及其私有化浪潮,在西方学术界和政策实践领域制造了两个所谓的程式化逻辑,即私有产权绝对比国有产权有效率;国有产权即意味着国家干预,必须实施彻底和不可逆转的私有化改革。然而,纵观资本主义发展过程中的私有化与国有化周期,特别是新自由主义时代,发达资本主义国家糟糕的经济表现,以及俄罗斯和拉美私有化的惨痛教训,无一不昭示着新自由主义理论和政策的危害。围绕“国进民退”之争,西方私有化理论也被国内一些人作为否定国有经济的理论工具。笔者认为,私有化不是中国国有企业改革的根本方向,更不能将社会主义和资本主义的国有经济等量齐观,从而否定国有经济在社会主义市场经济中的主导地位。
Neoliberalism and its privatization wave, which began in the late 1970s, created two so-called stylized logic in Western academia and policy practice that private ownership is definitely more efficient than state ownership; that state ownership means that the state To intervene, a thorough and irreversible privatization reform must be implemented. However, as we look at the privatization and nationalization cycles in the development of capitalism, especially in the neoliberal era, the poor economic performance of developed capitalist countries and the bitter lesson of the privatization of Russia and Latin America make clear the new freedom Harm of doctrine and policy. Around the “dispute between the state and the people”, the theory of privatization in the West has also been used by some people in the country as a theoretical tool to negate the state-owned economy. The author believes that privatization is not the fundamental direction of the reform of state-owned enterprises in China, nor can it be the same amount of socialism and capitalist state-owned economy, thus denying the dominant position of the state-owned economy in the socialist market economy.