长期以来 ,学术界对杨度持君宪救国思想主要存在两种观点 :一是完全否定 ,认为是逆民主潮流的反动政治思想 ,毫无进步可言。另一种分两个阶段来评价 ,认为 190 8年 4月在他进入宪政编查馆或辛亥革命之前 ,其君宪救国思想有一定进步性 ;而在辛亥后则站到了民主共和的对立面 ,起着阻碍社会进步的反动作用。我们认为 ,这是不客观的。实际上 ,从 190 2到 1917年张勋复辟失败之后 ,其君宪救国的政治理念是一以贯之的 ,只是前后政治倾向稍有侧重。辛亥前 ,他倾向于英国君主立宪模式 ,辛亥后民初社会的“典范危机”的失序混乱时势 ,他倾向于日本的立宪模式 ,希图以国家、君主之绝对权威来整合失序的混乱社会 ,因而更见其思想深度 For a long time, there are mainly two opinions in the academic circles about Yang Duzheng’s thought of helping the country and saving the country. One is to completely negate the reactionary political ideas that are regarded as the anti-democratic trend and there is no progress at all. Another is divided into two stages to evaluate that in April 1980, before he entered the Constitutional Compilation or Xinhai Revolution, the thought of saving the country by the Constitutional Monarchy had some progress. In 1911, however, he stood opposite the democratic republic, Play a reactionary role hindering social progress. We think it is not objective. In fact, after the failure of Zhang Xun’s restoration from 1902 to 1917, his political conception of saving the country from constitutional monarchy was a consistent one, with only a slight emphasis on political orientation before and after. Before 1911, he tended to disorder chaos in the British constitutional monarchy and the “model crisis” in the post-modern period of the post-Revolutionary period of the Xinhai people. He tended to Japan’s constitutional model and attempted to integrate the disorderly chaotic society with the absolute authority of the state and the monarchy See more of its depth of thought