论文部分内容阅读
民族主义主张以民族为人类群体生活的基本单位,自由主义则是以个体为本的意识形态。从政治哲学层面上看,民族主义是特殊主义的,而自由主义是普世主义的,两者之间虽有内在的矛盾和紧张,但都是一个现代性的问题。自由民族主义则力图调和这两种充满矛盾与冲突的意识形态。现代中国的自由主义与民族主义都是西方影响的产物,并且现代中国的自由主义自产生之日起,就与民族主义的目标纠缠不清。1940年代,主要是抗战胜利后中国知识分子一方面渴望建立一个以英美民主体制为榜样的社会,另一方面又极力维护民族利益不受侵害,从而表现出一种自由民族主义的思想倾向。这种自由主义与民族主义的整合在当今世界也依然是一个具有现实意义的现代性命题。
Nationalism advocates taking ethnic groups as the basic units of human groups and liberalism as individual-oriented ideologies. From the perspective of political philosophy, nationalism is specialist. Liberalism is universal. Despite the inherent contradictions and tensions between the two, they are both modern issues. Liberal nationalism seeks to reconcile these two ideologies full of contradictions and conflicts. Liberalism and nationalism in modern China are the products of Western influence, and the liberalism of modern China has become entangled with the goal of nationalism since it was created. In the 1940s, mainly after the victory of the Anti-Japanese War, Chinese intellectuals, on the one hand, long for the establishment of a society based on the Anglo-American democratic system and on the other hand, tried their best to safeguard the national interests from being infringed upon, thus showing a tendency toward free nationalism. This integration of liberalism and nationalism in today’s world also remains a realistic proposition of modernity.