论文部分内容阅读
法官在循环往复的思维考察过程中,既需要借助于实务经验,也需要运用法律推理技术,这种往返流转过程必须以客观的法律事实与实体法上的法律规范为依据和前提来进行。法律推理所关心的重要问题表现为由法律文本所体现的规范层面转向法律施行的实践层面,并且根据法律目的将规范适用于特定法律事实。判断一个法律事实是否符合法定的构成要件始终不是简单通过逻辑推论的涵摄就能实现的,法官在此过程中必须寻求最密切联系规则,使得法律事实与法律规范之间形成有效的链接,用法律方法论确立法律推理的前提,以便解决判决的合法性问题,由此确立法律推理对法治的建设性意义。
In the process of circular inspection, the judge not only needs the help of practical experience, but also needs to use the legal reasoning technology. The process of round-trip circulation must be based on the objective legal facts and substantive laws and norms. Important issues of legal reasoning are manifested in the fact that the normative aspects of the legal text shift to the practical aspects of law enforcement and that the norms apply to specific legal facts for legal purposes. Judging whether a legal fact complies with the statutory requirements can not always be achieved simply through the logical inference. Judges must seek the most relevant rules in this process so as to form an effective link between legal facts and legal norms. Legal methodology establishes the premise of legal reasoning in order to solve the problem of legality of judgments, thus establishing the constructive significance of legal reasoning to the rule of law.