城乡居民“同命不同价”现象问题一直都是理论界争论的话题,目前大部分学者认为“同命不同价”违背了平等权,提出应实行“同命同价”定额赔偿的主张。本文将结合死亡赔偿金的性质,从宪法、侵权责任法、法律的指导性作用等三个角度探讨城乡居民死亡赔偿区别对待存在的合理性,同时结合当前司法实践的局面,探讨城乡居民“同命不同价”的实践误区。 Urban and rural residents “different life ” phenomenon has always been the topic of debate in theorists. At present, most scholars think “same life with different price ” violates the right of equality, Proportion of fixed compensation. Based on the nature of the death compensation, this article will explore the rationality of the existence of discrimination in the compensation of death for urban and rural residents from the perspectives of constitution, tort law and the law, and at the same time, with the current situation of judicial practice, Same life different price "practice errors.