论文部分内容阅读
目的分析“就地后靠”与“外迁安置”2种安置方式对移民心理健康的影响。方法通过整群分层随机抽样,采用一般情况调查表、症状自评量表(SCL-90)和社会支持评定量表(SSRS)3种问卷调查,研究不同安置方式对移民心理健康的影响。结果与“就地后靠”相比,“外迁安置”移民在社会支持、邻里和睦、生活质量等方面较差(P<0.05)。在SCL-90中,“外迁安置”移民在症状总分、躯体化、强迫、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、精神病性得分均高于当地居民(P<0.01),同时,精神病性得分高于“就地后靠移民”(P=0.018 5)。结论与“就地后靠”相比,“外迁安置”对移民心理健康的影响更大。
Objective To analyze the impact of two kinds of resettlement modes on the psychological health of immigrants, such as “relying on land in time” and “relocating and resettlement”. Methods Three groups of questionnaires including general questionnaire, self-rating symptom scale (SCL-90) and social support rating scale (SSRS) were used to investigate the effect of different resettlement modes on the mental health of immigrants. As a result, immigrants with “relocation” had poorer social support, neighborhood harmony and quality of life (P <0.05) as compared with “relying on land”. In SCL-90, “relocated ” immigrants score higher than local residents in symptom score, somatization, coercion, depression, anxiety, hostility and psychosis (P <0.01) After “immigrants in situ” (P = 0.018 5). Conclusion Compared with “Relying on the spot ”, “relocation ” has a greater impact on the psychological health of immigrants.