论文部分内容阅读
在“耶鲁学派”解构批评家眼中,文类的界线并非泾渭分明,批评和文学亦非理所当然地各司其职。解构批评家往往将批评视作非附属的、与文学同样充满个性和创造力的文本。但这并不意味着批评与文学等同,毋宁说解构所主张的,是以对待文学的方式来对待批评,反之亦然,以对待批评的方式来对待文学。只有这种翻转的视角,才能使对立的二元得以相互交感、相互沟通,从而为文学研究带来新的契机。同时,解构批评家对批评与理论的看法也颇具启迪意义。
In the eyes of the “Yale School” deconstruction critics, the line of genre is not entirely different. Criticism and literature also do their part. Deconstruction critics often view criticism as non-affiliated texts that are as full of character and creativity as literature. However, this does not mean that criticism is equivalent to literature. Instead, it is argued that deconstruction advocates treating criticism in a way that treats literature, and vice versa, treating literature in a way that treats criticism. Only by turning this perspective can the opposite binary be allowed to interact with each other and communicate with each other, thus bringing new opportunities for literary studies. At the same time, deconstruction of critics of criticism and theory is also quite enlightening significance.