看了新《夜半歌声》,也看了不少对该片的评论文章。这些评论多是把新、旧两部《夜》片进行比较来谈其得失。诚然,同一题村,两部影片,进行比较衡量优劣,没有什么不可。这种比较评论也许对探讨艺术有所作用,而于社会有多大意义呢?尤其对今天的有年观众(占观众的绝大多数)来说,他们中的绝大多数都没有看过旧《夜》片,而该片看来又不可能再重映,那么这种比较评论在某种意义上岂不失去了似值?是不太科学的。 Read the new “half-night song”, also read a lot of comments on the film articles. These comments are mostly new and old “night” film to compare their gains and losses. It is true that the same title village, two films, compared to measure the pros and cons, there is nothing wrong. This comparative review may play a role in exploring the arts but not in society at all, especially for the overwhelming audiences (overwhelming majority of the audience) today. Most of them have not read the old “ Night ”film, and the film seems impossible to remake, then this kind of comparative criticism in the sense that it does not lose the value? Is not too scientific.