论文部分内容阅读
根据双反运动所揭发的材料,证明在地質勘探的技术工作思想中,存在着严重的教条主义。綜合起来,地質技术工作中教条主义大体上有三种表现形式:一种足不根据客观事实,不看对象,机械执行规程制度,把規程制度当成教条来生搬硬套:另一种是沒有把整个找矿勘探过程看做是一个認識和探索新事物的过程,不是通过技术实踐,研究各种地質现象,掌握它的规律,而是以書本理論或固有經驗来硬套客观实际;再一种是对某些先进事物采取教条主义的态度,不分析主客观情况,不问經济效果,盲目推廣。这三种不同形式的教条主义,在地質技术工作中,都程度不同的存在着。現从大写报中試选几例:其一,汤丹矿区根据矿体賦存形态及品位变化情况应属第二勘探类型,该队在确定网度时,沒有認真研究地表地質资料,就机械按照规
According to the material revealed by the double anti-movement, it is proved that there is serious dogmatism in the technical work thought of geological exploration. Taken together, there are basically three manifestations of dogmatism in geotechnical work: one is that it does not base itself on objective facts, does not look at objects, and the system of rules for the execution of machinery, The exploration process is regarded as a process of recognizing and exploring new things. Rather than studying various geological phenomena and mastering its laws through technical practice, the exploration process is based on the book theory or inherent experience to objective reality. The other is Take a dogmatic attitude toward certain advanced things, do not analyze the subjective and objective conditions, do not ask for economic results, and promote blindly. These three different forms of dogmatism exist in different degrees in the work of geotechnical engineering. Now from the capital newspaper to try a few cases: First, Tang Dan mining area according to the occurrence of ore body morphology and grade should belong to the second exploration type, the team in determining the network, did not seriously study the surface geological data on the machinery Follow the rules