论文部分内容阅读
对于代位权制度,我国大陆和台湾地区现行法均给予了规定。但大陆地区代位权制度是传统民法的特殊形态,从《合同法》实施十周年的实施效果上考察,这种模式出现了理论困境和实务拷问。因此,在我国大陆地区民法典制定的历史契机下,该制度实有修正和完善的必要。同时,对海峡两岸代位权法律制度构造进行比较,更能加深对本民族其他地区法律文化的了解和尊重,从而达到共同保护中华民族的优秀法律文化成果的目的。
As for the subrogation system, the existing laws in mainland China and Taiwan have given provisions. However, the system of subrogation in mainland China is a special form of traditional civil law. From the implementation effect of the tenth anniversary of the implementation of the Contract Law, there are theoretical difficulties and practical torture in this model. Therefore, under the historic turning point in the formulation of civil code in mainland China, the system is actually necessary to be amended and improved. At the same time, comparing the structures of the legal systems of the subrogation of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait makes it possible to deepen understanding and respect of the legal culture in the rest of the nation so as to achieve the objective of jointly protecting the outstanding legal culture of the Chinese nation.