以美国版骨与关节外科为例,探讨国外医学期刊的审稿标准。它们基于同行评议制度的审稿标准具有2个突出特点:一是总体评价与分项把关相结合;二是内容评议与方法学评议并重。科学、翔实的审稿标准有利于规范审稿人的审稿行为,帮助编辑评判稿件的学术价值和报告水平,为作者修改稿件提供指导和建议。 Take American Bone and Joint Surgery as an example to discuss the reviewing standards of foreign medical journals. They are based on peer review system reviewers standard has two salient features: First, the overall evaluation and sub-checks; second is content evaluation and methodological evaluation of both. Scientifically and thoroughly reviewing the manuscript standard is helpful to standardize the manuscript reviewer’s manuscript reviewing behavior, help to edit the academic value and report level of the manuscript, and provide guidance and suggestions for the author to modify the manuscript.