论文部分内容阅读
与前五部《广东通志》及谢启昆的《广西通志》相比,清道光年间阮元纂修的《广东通志.谪宦录》在谪宦的体例、谪宦的类型、谪宦对象的确定、谪宦地域的界定以及对文献的考辨、补充等方面都有重大突破,但对广东历代谪宦的收录不全却是该志谪宦录的严重不足之处。
Compared with the “Guangdong Tung Chi” of the first five “Guangdong Teng Chi” and Xie Qikun’s “Guangxi Tung Chi”, “Guangdong Tongzhihuanzhu” recorded by Ruan Yuan during the Qing dynasty was mainly composed of the style of the official, the type of the official, There are significant breakthroughs in the definition of the officialdom, as well as in the examination and supplement of the documents. However, the incomplete collection of the official records of the ancient dynasties in Guangdong is a serious deficiency of the official records.