论文部分内容阅读
颜岩在《东岳论丛》2014年第10期撰文指出,虽然布达佩斯学派描述的公社具有很多优点,但并不能说明这是一条社会革命现实可行的道路。首先,公社是在资本主义社会内部形成的,这与马克思主义经典作家关于未来共产主义社会家庭形式的论述存在根本性差别,马克思主义经典作家始终认为私有制的废除是未来家庭形式生成的基本前提。布达佩斯学派则认为,在资本主义私有制下,人们也可以让家庭成为非经济单位,让私人家务成为公共事业,让孩子的抚养成为公共的事务,让一切孩
Yan Yan wrote in Dongyue Symposium No.10, 2014 that although the Commune described by the Budapest School has many advantages, it does not mean that this is a realistic and viable road to social revolution. First of all, the commune is formed within the capitalist society, which is fundamentally different from the classical Marxist writer’s account of the family form of the future communist society. The classic Marxist writers always hold the view that the abolition of private ownership is the basic precondition for future generation of family forms. Under the private ownership of capitalism, the Budapest School believes that people can also make their families into non-economic units, make private housework a public utility, make child rearing a public affair, and let all children