在新加坡,关于履约保函止付的法律主要体现在其法院的判例当中。除“欺诈”之外,“显失公平”常被新加坡的法院援引为履约保函止付的理由,并行使其自由裁量权发出止付禁令。由于“显失公平”的定义一直不明确,所以具体案件中的“显失公平”还需根据其具体事实情况予以确认。 In Singapore, the law on the payment of performance bonds is mainly reflected in the jurisprudence of its courts. In addition to “fraud ”, “obviously unfair ” is often cited by the courts in Singapore as a reason for the performance bond to stop, and exercise its discretion to issue a stop injunction. Since the definition of “apparent unfairness” has not been clearly defined, the “unfairness” in specific cases needs to be confirmed on the basis of its specific facts.