论文部分内容阅读
为了解某型滑膛炮在两种永备工事内发射时产生的有害气体、粉尘、冲击波等不利因素对炮手机体的影响程度,并对这两种工事与炮手现有防护装备进行卫生学评价,我们于1983年6月20～24日在配合工程兵、炮兵等单位进行工事內发射试验中作了卫生学凋查,现将结果总结于后。测试方法某型滑膛炮工事内发射试验是在短洞工事和贯通工事两种永备工事中进行的。工事的结构、形状大致相同,均无消声设施。不同的是贯通工事头部射口小,尾部开口大。而短洞工事头部射口大,尾部设一个小的竖井开口。试验时,火炮发射角为偏左15°。每个工事内各发射八发炮弹,均采用单发、单发、二连发、四连发的射击方式。试验中,炮手的个人防护除采用PF-81-1型防震耳罩和上身着人造革泡沫塑料防护背心外,无其它防护装备。具体测试方法如下。
In order to understand the impact of adverse factors such as harmful gases, dust and shock wave generated by a type of smoothbore gun on firing in two permanent fortifications, and to evaluate the hygienic effect of these two types of work and existing guns on guns , We conducted a hygiene investigation on the launching of the fortifications with engineers and artillery units from June 20 to June 24, 1983. The results are summarized below. Test Method One type of smoothbore gun internal launch test is carried out in two short-fortifications and fortifications fortifications. Fortifications structure, roughly the same shape, no anechoic facilities. The difference is that the piercing through the head of the building is small and the tail opening is large. The short hole fortifications big head shot, the tail is set to a small shaft openings. Test, the artillery firing angle of 15 degrees to the left. Each firing station fired eight rounds of artillery shells, all using single shot, single shot, two shots and four shots. Test, the gunner’s personal protection in addition to using PF-81-1 shockproof earmuffs and upper body with a foam protective vest, no other protective equipment. Specific test methods are as follows.