测谎技术的产生时间并不长,但其在诉讼活动中的应用却日趋增多,对测谎结论的证据价值的争议也开始在法学界显现。在我国,应以与时俱进的态度看待测谎结论,在了解测谎技术科学性的基础上,将测谎结论设定为鉴定结论形式中的“有限采用”辅助证据,从而更好地为司法实践提供帮助。 Polygraph technology has not been produced for a long time, but its application in litigation activities has been increasing day by day. The controversy over the evidence value of polygraph findings has also begun to appear in jurisprudence. In our country, the polygraph conclusion should be viewed with the attitude of keeping pace with the times. On the basis of knowing the scientific nature of the polygraph technique, the polygraph conclusion is set as “limited use” auxiliary evidence in the form of identification conclusion, so that more Good for judicial practice to help.