《从收藏马恒昌小组档案全宗谈起》这篇文章的意图,我主观认为一是马恒昌小组档案全宗的出现是档案工作一种新的改革开拓;二是以小团体建立全宗从势在可行到势在必行。我不以为然。马恒昌小组不是社会上那些独立的小团体组织,而是附属于一个厂(单位)的小团体,因此,它所产生形成的档案是该厂档案(全宗)的一部分。笔者认为以这种小团体所产生形成的档案另立全宗无论从理论上、实践中均无太多合理性,相反的,还将出现一些不良的反响。 “From the collection of Ma Hengchang group file Fazong talk about” the intention of this article, I subjectively think that one is Mahengchang Group Fonds appearing in the archives is a new reform and opening up; the second is to establish a small group of Fonds Feasible is imperative. I do not think so. The Mahengchang Group is not a small, independent organization in society, but a small group attached to a factory (unit), so the resulting archives are part of the archives (Fonds) of the factory. In my opinion, there is not much rationality in the theory and practice of establishing separate archives of such small groups. On the contrary, there will be some unpleasant repercussions.