中国地方志协会1997年会明确提出续修地方志要有一个准备阶段,认真总结首届修志实践的经验教训是准备阶段最重要、最现实的工作。关于理论准备,年会主要讨论了以下6个问题。 1.断限问题。一般主张:作为续修,新志的上限应当紧接前志的下限,如前志下限为1985年,续志上限即应为1986年。也有主张续志上限不必紧接前志,可以自行决定。 关于续志的下限,有两种意见。一种意见主张下限断在本世纪末,不跨世纪,一种意见按照20年续修一次的原则,该跨世纪就跨世纪。志书下限跨不跨世纪并非原则性问题。 2.衔接问题。这个衔接系指近些年来,一些地区行政建制发生变化后的后志与前志如何衔接的问题。年会讨论中提出了一个解决这个问题的原则:旧续、新修。即:原建制所修志书至改制之时,仍按原建制续修,如原为××县,仍续为××县志。自改制之日起,则为新修。如原为××县志,改为××区或××市,则新修 China Association of Local Records in 1997 will be made clear that there must be a preparatory period for the rehabilitation of local history, conscientiously sum up the experience of the first revision of the practice is the preparation phase of the most important and most realistic work. On the theoretical preparation, the annual meeting mainly discussed the following six questions. Cut off the problem The general idea: as a renewal, the upper limit of the new blog should be immediately before the lower limit, such as the former lower limit for the 1985, resume the upper limit that should be 1986. There are also claims to resume the upper limit do not have to go directly to the fore, you can decide. There are two opinions on the lower limit of follow-up. A view advocating a lower limit cut off at the end of this century, not cross the century, an opinion in accordance with the principle of renewal of 20 years, the cross century to cross the century. It is not a matter of principle to cross the lower limit of the book. 2. Connection problems. This convergence refers to the issue of how the postscripts and predecessors after the changes in the administrative system in some regions converged in recent years. During the discussion in the annual meeting, a principle for resolving the issue was put forward: old and new. Namely: When the original system of building the book to the revision of the system, still according to the original system of repair, such as the original County, still xx County. Since the date of restructuring, the new repair. Such as the original county of XX, XX area or XX City, the new repair