论文部分内容阅读
德拉·沃尔佩把黑格尔的历史唯心主义还原为一种一般唯心主义,认为黑格尔的哲学在本质上只不过是一种否定的神学,其辩证法也只是一种先验的辩证法;而马克思的哲学则是对黑格尔哲学的批判,这种批判表现为马克思与黑格尔在方法论上的彻底决裂,进而认为方法论的变革——科学辩证法——才是马克思哲学革命的根本体现。但是德拉·沃尔佩在解释这种方法论变革的时候,并不是立足于马克思文本本身的含义,而是戴上亚里士多德、伽利略的眼镜来反观马克思的方法论的,在本质上已经用亚里士多德的无矛盾原理和伽利略的实验方法偷偷地置换掉了马克思的历史唯物主义,把马克思的方法论还原为一般唯物主义的实验理性,这是对马克思哲学的极大误读,已经远远地背离了马克思哲学革命的实质。
Della Volpe reduced Hegel’s historical idealism to a kind of general idealism, thinking that Hegel’s philosophy is essentially a negative theology and its dialectics is only a transcendental dialectic ; While Marx’s philosophy is a critique of Hegel’s philosophy. This criticism shows the complete breakup of methodology in Marx and Hegel, and then that the change of methodology - the scientific dialectics - is the basis of Marx’s philosophical revolution reflect. However, when Della Volpe was explaining this methodological change, he did not base himself on the meaning of the Marxist text but put on the eye glasses of Aristotle and Galileo instead of Marx’s methodology. In essence, Aristotle’s contradictory principle and Galileo’s experimental method secretly replaced Marxist historical materialism and reduced Marx’s methodology to the experimental materialism of general materialism. This is a great misreading of Marx’s philosophy, Far from the essence of Marx’s philosophical revolution.