美国的法院将集体抵制行为划分为横向集体抵制和纵向集体抵制,前者往往适用本身违法原则,而后者一般适用合理原则。这种思路对于我国行业协会集体抵制行为的反垄断法规制提供了重要启示。一方面,行业协会对其成员企业的商业性集体抵制应当适用合理原则;另一方面,对非成员企业的商业性集体抵制又应当作横向集体抵制和纵向集体抵制的区分,进而对其采取不同的原则。 The courts in the United States divided the collective boycott into horizontal collective boycott and vertical collective boycott. The former applied their own principle of illegality, while the latter generally applied the principle of fairness. This kind of train of thought has offered the important enlightenment to the antitrust rules and regulations of the collective boycott behavior of our country’s trade association. On the one hand, the trade association’s collective bargaining with its member enterprises should apply the principle of fairness; on the other hand, the commercial collective boycott of non-member enterprises should be distinguished by horizontal collective boycott and vertical collective boycott, the rules.