论文部分内容阅读
一、续《文选》观点的提出最早指出《文苑英华》与《文选》关系的是明代胡维新,他在《刻〈文苑英华〉序》中云:“《苑》之集始于梁,而部系类分,悉宗《选》例,非嗣文以承统乎?”①认为《文苑英华》是衔接和继承《文选》而来,其依据是《文苑英华》录文始于梁代(《文选》录文止于梁代),体例上以《文选》为蓝本。此观点被普遍认可,如《四库全书总目》言《文苑英华》“梁昭明太子选撰《文选》三十卷,迄于梁初。此书所录,则起于梁末,盖即以上续《文选》。其分类编辑,体例亦略相同,而门类更为繁碎。则后来文体日增,非旧目所能括也。”只在体例上看法与胡维新稍有差异,
I. CONTINUING THE PROPOSITION OF “WEN XUAN XIE” The earliest point of view that “Wen Yuan Ying Hua” and “Wen Xuan” are related is Hu Weixin of the Ming Dynasty. His collection of “Yuan” Liang, and the Department of the class points, Szeto “election” example, the non-hereditary to bear the same? “① that” Wen Yuan Ying Hua “is the convergence and succession” anthology “, based on” Wen Yuan Ying Hua “ The essay began in the Liang Dynasty (”anthology“ essay ending in the Liang Dynasty), the way to ”anthology“ as the blueprint. This view is generally recognized, such as the ”Sikuquanshu“ head ”Wen Yuan Yinghua“ ”Selected Poems by Prince Leung Cho Ming“ anthology ”thirty volumes, as early as Liang Chu. Cover that is continued above “Wenxuan.” The classification of editors, the system is also slightly the same, while the more fragmented categories, then the increasing style of writing, non-old purpose can also be included. "Only in view of the body and Hu Wei new slightly difference,