论文部分内容阅读
通过学科史的回顾,文章力图论证一次新的学科转向的可能性。此种转向的理论倾向是实用主义的,也即,在认识到社会世界的复杂性之后,仍然相信某种普适性理解的可能;同时,作者提出地志学转向作为具体进路。地志学转向力图恢复人类学对于世界物质性的关注,强调:社会空间与地理空间在经验中是融合的,个人是栖居在特定世界中的。此种实用主义味道的地志学既克服了现象学把人类学简化为琐碎故事、直觉体验的弊端,从而保证了“彻底解释”的可能,也充分地承认了现象学所强调的身体感知、意念投射对于理解社会的那种浮现性质的重要地位。此种转向既是一种社会本体论,又是一种认识论,同时也是对民族志和田野工作的重新理解。
Through the review of academic history, the article tries to demonstrate the possibility of a new subject shift. The theoretical tendency of such a turn is pragmatic, that is, after recognizing the complexity of the social world, it still believes in the possibility of a universal understanding; and at the same time, the author proposes that geostationary turn as a concrete approach. Geotautism turned to restore anthropological attention to the materiality of the world, stressing that social space and geospatial integration are in experience and that individuals are dwelling in a particular world. This pragmatic flavor of geomatics not only overcomes the shortcomings of phenomenology in simplifying anthropology to trivial stories and intuitionistic experiences, thus ensuring the possibility of “thorough interpretation,” but also admits fully the body perceptions emphasized by phenomenology , The importance of the projection of ideas in understanding the apparent nature of society. This shift is both a social ontology and an epistemology, as well as a new understanding of ethnography and fieldwork.