论文部分内容阅读
目的研究网球肘采用小针刀疗法和体外冲击波治疗的临床效果对比。方法临床纳入100例我院2014年1月~2015年9月收治的网球肘患者，根据采用的治疗方式不同分为两组。其中50例患者采用小针刀疗法治疗作为对照组，另50例患者采用冲击波治疗作为观察组。结果观察组患者治疗后第10d、第20d的疗效显著优于对照组，两组相比较，<0.05。结论小针刀疗法与体外冲击波治疗网球肘，疗效均显著，但在临床治疗时间和创伤方面，冲击波治疗略优于小针刀疗法。“,”Objective To compare the clinical effect of small-needle-knife therapy and extracorporeal shock wave in the treatment of tennis elbow. Methods 100 patients with tennis elbow treated from January 2014 to September 2015 in our hospital were selected.The patients were divided into two groups according to different therapies,50 cases each group.The control group adopted the small-needle-knife therapy and the observation group adopted the extracorporeal shock wave.Results In the tenth and twentieth day of treatment,the curative effect of observation group was better than that of control group ( <0.05).Conclusion The small-needle-knife therapy and extracorporeal shock wave has an obvious effect in the treatment of tennis elbow.The treatment time and trauma based on the extracorporeal shock wave is slightly better than that of small-needle-knife therapy.