作为一个编辑,几乎每天都与选题打交道,一年一度的选题计划论证、临时性的选题增补,不知要耗费编辑们多少心血。然而,据笔者了解,对于什么是选题,并不是每一个编辑都十分清楚。如有人将选题仅仅看成出书的题目,作者送来一本书稿,或者要求出一本什么书,将书名报上去就视为选题。这是对选题的简单化理解。 顾名思义,选题应是经过选择的出书题目,重在“选择”二字。而选择,就是既有所取,又有所舍。出书题目的取舍的一项很复杂的工作,其中至少要考虑三个因素:(1)是否符合党的出版方针政策,是否遵守党的出版纪律,违背党的出版方针政策和出版纪律的出书题目,应坚决舍弃。(2)是否适应读者的需求,读者不需要的出书题目,应毫无犹豫地舍弃。(3)该出书题目所体现的内容是否反映所属领域的研究水平,是领先于还是落后于所属领域的研究水平,落后于所属领域研究水平的出书题目,亦应坚决舍弃。这三个因素从三个方面确认选题的质量。如果给选题下一个定义,那就是:选题是依据党的出版方针政策,从适应 As an editor, he deals with the topics almost every day, the annual topic selection plan demonstration and temporary topic additions, and I do not know how much the editors need to spend. However, as far as I know, not every editor is very clear about what is the subject of the election. Anyone who chooses the title as a book title, the author sends out a book, or asks for a copy of the book, the title of the book is considered a topic. This is a simplified understanding of the topic. As the name suggests, the title should be selected after the title of the book, focusing on “choice” word. The choice is to take both, but also homes. There are at least three factors that should be considered: (1) Whether it is in conformity with the party’s publishing policies and policies, whether it complies with the party’s publishing discipline, and violates the party’s publishing policies and publishing disciplines Book title, should be firmly abandoned. (2) whether to adapt to the needs of readers, readers do not need the title of the book, should not hesitate to give up. (3) Whether the content reflected in the title of the book reflects the level of the research in the field belongs to whether it is ahead of or behind the research level in its field, lags behind the research topic in its field, and should be resolutely discarded. These three factors confirm the quality of the selected topics from three aspects. If you give the title the next definition, that is: the topic is based on the party’s publishing guidelines and policies, from adaptation