论文部分内容阅读
网络文学领域侵害著作权的行为方式多样,最主要的还是专业化盗版网络文学站点模式。为了加强对于网络文学作品著作权的保护,建议删除侵害著作权罪中“以营利为目的”这一要件的呼声很高,但是删除这一要件并不能产生很好的保护效果,相反会压榨“合理使用”的生存空间,所以应当保留“以营利为目的”这一条件,在网络文学著作权的保护上,注重刑法保护与民事赔偿的协调。“犯罪所得数额”由于其在罪名认定上存在模糊性,可以将认定标准变更为“销售金额”这一更具有实践操作性的标准。刑法司法解释规定的“复制发行”与《著作权法》规定存在差异,在该司法解释依旧有效的情况下,应当遵循该司法解释,认定“盗贴”和“盗打”属于刑法第217条规定的“复制发行”。
There are various ways of infringement of copyrights in the field of online literature, and the most important one is the specialized website model of pirated online literature. In order to strengthen the protection of the copyright of online literary works, it is suggested that the removal of the element of “for profit for copyright infringement” is very high, but the deletion of this requirement does not produce good protection effect, Therefore, we should keep “for the purpose of for profit ” this condition, in the protection of Internet literature copyright, pay attention to the coordination of criminal law protection and civil compensation. “Amount of proceeds of crime ” Due to its ambiguity in the identification of guilty, the standard of recognition can be changed to a more practical standard of “sales amount ”. If the judicial interpretation is still valid, the judicial interpretation of the criminal interpretation of the criminal law stipulates that there are differences between the provisions of the “copy distribution” and the “Copyright Law”, that judicial interpretation should be followed and the “stolen copy” and “stolen” Belonging to Article 217 of the Criminal Code “copy issue ”.