论文部分内容阅读
传统意义上的真之符合论把“真”理解为思想与世界的关系,强调“真”的属性与作用;真之紧缩论则以真的透明性为直觉,涵盖了包括弗雷格紧缩思想、冗余论、代语句理论和极小主义理论在内的几种理论,这些理论的核心思想认为真谓词仅仅起着逻辑句法作用,它的出现不能给语句增添任何实体属性。于是,“真是否有本质”成为符合论与紧缩论争论的焦点,这一争论也成为区分不同真之理论的新标准。
True coincidence in the traditional sense regards “truth” as the relationship between thought and the world, emphasizing the property and function of “truth.” True tightening is intuitively based on true transparency, Several theories, including Craig’s tightening thought, Redundancy Theory, Substitutional Sentence Theory and Minimalism theory, are put forward. The core idea of these theories is that the true predicate plays only a logical syntactic role, and its appearance can not add any substantive attribute to the sentence. Thus, “whether or not there is a real essence” has become the focus of the debate between the theory of conformity and the theory of austerity. This argument has also become the new standard for distinguishing theories of different truths.