论文部分内容阅读
作者通过对高木秉《唐诗品汇》所引严羽论诗语、元代摘编《严沧浪先生诗法》、李严《诗辨》的考察 ,指出在宋末及元代 ,流传着严氏著作的不同文本。作者通过考察《沧浪吟卷》的版本源流 ,指出李南叔录本《沧浪吟卷》始刻于元代 ,并不存在所谓宋刻李南叔录本。民国张钧衡《适园丛书》本《沧浪吟卷》补足元刊本所脱三首半诗 ,作者发现两个日本本子也载有这三首半诗 ,并考定此三首半诗的补足时间在乾隆四十一年 (1776 )以前。学术界相信此三首半诗的真实性 ,作者对此提出了质疑。对于严羽《评点李太白诗集》 ,作者则认为应是出于伪托
Through the investigation of Yan Yu’s poetic language quoted by Gao Mubing’s Tang Poetry Department and the poem “Yan Changlang” by Yuan Dynasty and Li Yan’s “Poetry Discrimination”, the author points out that in the late Song Dynasty and the Yuan Dynasty, Different texts of the book. By examining the source of the edition of Cang Lang Yin Zhen, the author points out that the original version of Cang Lang Yin Yin, written by Li Nan Shu, was inscribed on the Yuan dynasty, and there is no transcript of Li Nan Shu, the so-called Song Dynasty. In the Republic of China, Zhang Junheng’s “Garden Books” “The Canglang Yinzuo” supplemented the first half of the poem, and the author found that the two Japanese books also contained the three half-poems and considered the three half- Forty-one years in Qianlong (1776) before. Academics believe the authenticity of the three half-poems, the author questioned this. For Yan Yu “Comment on Li Taibai Poetry,” the author thinks it should be out of the false care