论文部分内容阅读
与正统的解释相比,马克思主义坚持认为资本主义的内在矛盾是危机根源的说法更具有说服力。但马克思主义理论不能解释为什么经济危机会周期性爆发,也不能解释什么样的内在机制有助于资本主义从经济萧条转为经济繁荣。马克思把危机视为解决资本主义内在矛盾的暂时的和不得已的手段。大量的马克思主义文献也主要关注资本主义怎么进入危机,而不是如何从危机中走出来。本文主要考察目前流行的理论解释资本主义周期性危机中的两个过程的能力以及这些理论的内在一致性,并提供一些经验性的检验依据。实际上,目前的所有解释都不是非常令人满意,所给出的证据也远不是结论性的。本文尝试提出一个基于比例失调和不断变化的资本价值构成的综合性解释模型。
Compared with the orthodox explanation, Marxism insists that the inherent contradiction of capitalism is the root cause of the crisis more convincing. However, Marxist theory can not explain why the economic crisis will periodically erupt or explain what kind of internal mechanism helps capitalism shift from a recession to an economic prosperity. Marx regarded the crisis as a temporary and indispensable measure for resolving the internal contradictions of capitalism. A large number of Marxist literature is also mainly concerned with how capitalism entered the crisis, not how to emerge from the crisis. This article examines the current prevailing theories of the ability to explain the two processes in a cyclical crisis of capitalism and the inherent consistency of these theories and provides some empirical evidence for testing. In fact, all current explanations are not very satisfactory, and the evidence given is far from conclusive. This article attempts to propose a comprehensive explanation model based on the proportional imbalances and changing capital values.