论文部分内容阅读
本文在重构作者这两种思维范式形成和转换的基础上,从实用主义角度和规范主义的立场对于二者做出了反思,从实用主义的角度出发,立法者的法理学将“国家”纳入法理学的思考有助于实现通过法律的国家治理;从规范主义的角度出发,法律人的法理学重视法律规范对于现实秩序的稳定性维护,消弭了政治与法律之间的冲突,避免法律的过度政治化。在国家建构和法理学转型的双重背景下,应该重视立法者的法理学和法律人的法理学两种思维方式,实现二者之间的优势互补,唯有此才能真正实现通过法律的国家治理,发挥法律在国家建构中的重要作用。
On the basis of the formation and transformation of these two kinds of thinking paradigms of the reconstruction author, this article makes a reflection on the two from the perspective of pragmatism and normativism. From the pragmatism point of view, "Into jurisprudence thinking helps to achieve through the law of state governance; from the normativist perspective, legal people jurisprudence emphasis on legal norms for the stability of the real order of maintenance, eliminating the conflict between politics and law, Avoid excessive politicization of the law. Under the dual background of national construction and jurisprudence transformation, we should attach importance to the legislature jurisprudence and legal person jurisprudence two ways of thinking, to achieve mutual complementarity between the two, only in this way can we truly through the legal state governance , Play an important role in the construction of the law in the country.