论文部分内容阅读
通过保障当事人的调查取证权,可以使当事人获得所需要的证据,维护其合法权益,从而实现司法公正。但我国无论是现行立法,还是在司法实践中对当事人的调查取证权的保障都很薄弱。本文在比较两大法系主要国家关于保障调查取证权的立法例的基础上,对我国在保障当事人调查取证权中所存在的问题进行了分析,并提出了自己的设想。
By safeguarding the parties’ right of investigation and evidence collection, the parties can obtain the necessary evidence and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests so as to achieve judicial fairness. However, both our country’s current legislation and the protection of the parties’ investigation and evidence collection rights are very weak in judicial practice. Based on the comparison of the legislative cases of the two major legal systems in safeguarding the right of investigation and evidence collection, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the investigation and the right of the parties involved in the investigation and provides our own ideas.